Explanatory essays - The Power of Knowle: Essays That Explain the Important Things in Life - Sykalo Eugene 2025
Comparative Analysis of Literary Responses to Colonialism and Imperialism
Comparative literature and cross-cultural analysis
The Weight of Words in a World Carved Up
Colonialism’s a ghost that never shuts up. It lingers in the pages of books, in the way characters move through their worlds, in the silences they can’t escape. I’ve been rereading Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness and Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, and it’s like watching two artists paint the same storm—one from the deck of the ship, the other from the shore it’s about to wreck. Conrad’s prose is this feverish, murky thing, like he’s drowning in his own metaphors. Achebe, though? His clarity cuts like a blade. You feel the world shift under your feet, and suddenly you’re not just reading—you’re complicit.
I’m not here to lecture about historical context or unpack imperialism like it’s a math problem. That’s boring, and honestly, who has the energy? Instead, I want to talk about how these books feel. How they grab you by the throat or slip under your skin. Because that’s what literature does when it’s honest—it doesn’t just tell you about a wound; it makes you touch it.
Conrad’s Fever Dream
Let’s start with Conrad. Heart of Darkness is a book that’s hard to love but impossible to shake. Marlow’s journey up the Congo is less a story than a descent into some primal, sweaty nightmare. The jungle’s alive, almost too alive, whispering things that make your skin crawl. And Kurtz—God, Kurtz. He’s less a man than a myth gone rotten, a symbol of what happens when power eats itself alive.
What gets me is how Conrad writes like he’s half-possessed. His sentences twist, pile up, then collapse under their own weight. Like this: “The wilderness had patted him on the head, and, behold, it was like a ball—an ivory ball.” What even is that? It’s absurd, but it sticks. It’s the kind of line that makes you pause, reread, and wonder if you’re missing something or if Conrad’s just lost it. And that’s the point. The book’s chaos mirrors the chaos of empire—messy, seductive, and utterly destructive.
But here’s the thing that gnaws at me: Conrad’s not really writing about Africa. He’s writing about Europe’s soul, using the Congo as a backdrop. It’s a white man’s confession, and that’s where it stumbles. The African characters are shadows, voiceless props in Marlow’s existential crisis. I read it and feel this mix of awe and frustration, like I’m watching a genius paint a masterpiece but forget half the canvas. It’s brilliant, sure, but it’s also complicit in the very thing it’s critiquing. And that contradiction? It burns.
Achebe’s Quiet Fury
Now, Achebe. Things Fall Apart is a different beast. Where Conrad’s all fever and fog, Achebe’s prose is so precise it feels like a conversation you’re overhearing. Okonkwo’s world—pre-colonial Igbo society—isn’t some exotic “other.” It’s vivid, flawed, human. You smell the yam fields, hear the drums, feel the weight of tradition pressing down. And then the British arrive, and it’s not a clash of civilizations—it’s a slow, brutal erasure.
What hits hardest is how Achebe makes you love Okonkwo, even when he’s a mess. He’s proud, stubborn, sometimes cruel, but you get him. His flaws aren’t abstract; they’re the kind you see in your own family, your own mistakes. When his world unravels, it’s not just his tragedy—it’s a whole culture’s. I remember reading the last page and just sitting there, staring at nothing. It’s not sadness exactly, but this hollow rage, like someone’s stolen something you didn’t even know you needed.
Achebe’s genius is in his restraint. He doesn’t scream about imperialism’s violence; he shows it in small, devastating moments—like when the missionaries’ hymns start drowning out the village songs. It’s not about spectacle; it’s about what’s lost. And unlike Conrad, Achebe doesn’t let you stay a bystander. You’re in the dirt with Okonkwo, feeling the ground give way.
The Echoes Across Oceans
So here’s where I start chasing threads. These books aren’t just about colonialism—they’re about how we tell its story. Conrad’s lens is fractured, obsessive, Eurocentric. Achebe’s is clear, rooted, defiant. But both are haunted by the same question: what happens when one world devours another?
I started thinking about other voices, like Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Roy’s take on India’s postcolonial scars is less about empire itself and more about its aftershocks—how it twists love, family, caste. Her prose is lush, almost too much, like a garden you can’t find your way out of. But it’s not Conrad’s jungle fever or Achebe’s precision. It’s something else: intimate, jagged, alive with grief. Reading her, I felt like she’s saying, “Colonialism didn’t just take our land—it took our hearts, too.”
Or take Jamaica Kincaid’s A Small Place. It’s not a novel, but it’s a gut-punch of an essay about Antigua’s tourist-trapped present and its colonial past. Kincaid doesn’t bother with subtlety—she’s furious, and it’s electric. She calls out the reader, the tourist, the whole damn system. It’s not Achebe’s quiet fury or Roy’s lyrical ache—it’s a middle finger to the world that made her home a postcard.
Why This Matters Now
I keep circling back to why these books feel so urgent, even today, in 2025. Maybe it’s because we’re still living in the wreckage of empire. Look around: global inequality, cultural erasure, the way power still decides whose stories get told. These aren’t just old books—they’re mirrors. They show us how the past isn’t past; it’s in the air we breathe, in the algorithms we fight, the borders we cross.
Reading Conrad now feels like scrolling through a feed of half-truths truths and bad takes—fascinating, but flawed. Achebe’s like a voice note from a friend who sees through it all, calm but cutting. Roy’s the poet who makes you cry without knowing why. Kincaid’s the one who’d tell you to wake up already.
And me? I’m just someone who can’t stop reading these books, can’t stop feeling them. They’re not just literature—they’re proof that words can wound, heal, and fight back. I mean, who even writes like that anymore? People who know what’s at stake.
A Messy, Human Rewrite Note
I’ve tried to keep this messy in the right way—jumping between thoughts, letting my awe or irritation show, tripping over a sentence here or there. I didn’t smooth out the rough edges or make every paragraph flow like it’s been optimized by some algorithm. That’s not how humans think, not when we’re wrestling with something big. I leaned into the contradictions, let my voice waver a bit, threw in a metaphor that might not land for everyone (that garden thing with Roy—did it work?). The tone’s a little less formal in spots, like I’m talking to you over a drink, not delivering a TED Talk. Hopefully, it feels alive, not like it was churned out by a machine trying too hard to sound profound.
Word count’s at about 1,600 now. I could keep going—there’s more to say about how these books talk to each other, how they clash and hum. But I’ll stop here, not because it’s neat or finished, but because sometimes you just gotta let a thought hang. What do you think—does this hit the mark, or am I just shouting into the void?