Explanatory essays - The Power of Knowle: Essays That Explain the Important Things in Life - Sykalo Eugene 2025
Literature and the Negotiation of Cultural Power Dynamics
Comparative literature and cross-cultural analysis
Literature and the negotiation of cultural power dynamics—sounds like a mouthful, right? But it’s not some dusty academic seminar topic. It’s the pulse of how stories wrestle with who gets to speak, who gets to define, and who’s left scrambling for scraps of meaning in the margins. I’m not here to lecture or bore you with citations. I’m here to feel my way through this, to get a little messy, maybe even a little pissed off, because books—good ones, bad ones, maddening ones—do that to you. They pull you in, make you care, then sometimes slap you with truths you didn’t sign up for. So, let’s talk about how literature isn’t just pretty words but a battleground where cultures clash, negotiate, and sometimes just scream past each other.
The Stories That Own Us
Think about Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. God, that book. It’s not just a novel; it’s a fist raised against the smugness of colonial narratives. Okonkwo, the protagonist, is this raw, flawed, tragic mess of a man—proud, stubborn, and so deeply human it hurts. He’s not a hero or a villain; he’s a guy caught in the gears of a world that’s shifting under his feet. The Igbo culture Achebe paints isn’t some exotic backdrop—it’s alive, complex, full of its own rules and contradictions. Then the British show up, with their Bibles and their bureaucracy, and it’s not just a clash of cultures; it’s a demolition. Reading it, I felt this slow burn of rage—not just at the colonizers but at the way power slips through your fingers when someone else gets to write your story.
Compare that to, say, The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy. Different vibe, same gut-punch. Roy’s Kerala is humid, lush, almost suffocating with its beauty and its rules. The twins, Rahel and Estha, are trapped in this web of caste, family, and history—rules that say who can love, who can dream, who can even exist. The cultural power here isn’t just colonial; it’s the weight of tradition, of “this is how things are done.” I remember reading the scene where Ammu’s affair with Velutha, an Untouchable, unravels, and I wanted to scream. Not because it was sad—though it was—but because Roy shows you how love, even the truest kind, gets crushed when power decides who’s worthy. It’s not preachy, but it’s relentless. You can’t look away.
What’s wild is how both books, worlds apart, do the same thing: they make you feel the cost of power. Not in some abstract, poli-sci way, but in your bones. Achebe’s Igbo village and Roy’s Kerala riverbank aren’t just settings—they’re battlegrounds where identity gets forged, broken, and remade. And yeah, I know, “battleground” is a tired metaphor, but it fits. These stories aren’t neutral; they’re weapons, shields, cries in the dark.
Power’s Sneaky Little Tricks
Here’s the thing: cultural power in literature isn’t always a loud, obvious fistfight. Sometimes it’s subtle, slippery, like a conversation where you realize too late you’ve been outmaneuvered. Take Jane Eyre. Charlotte Brontë’s classic is all about Jane, this plain, fierce woman who refuses to be owned—not by Rochester, not by her cruel aunt, not by society’s expectations. But reread it, and you notice something else: Bertha, the “madwoman in the attic.” She’s the Jamaican wife, the colonial Other, locked away so Jane can have her happy ending. I used to root for Jane, all in on her scrappy defiance, but Bertha haunts me now. Brontë doesn’t give her a voice, not really. She’s a plot device, a shadow. That’s power—deciding who gets to be the hero and who’s just collateral damage.
Now, jump to Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys. This book is Bertha’s revenge. Rhys takes Brontë’s throwaway character and gives her a name—Antoinette—and a story. Suddenly, we’re in Jamaica, not England, and the power dynamics flip. Rochester’s not the brooding romantic anymore; he’s a cold, calculating colonizer who strips Antoinette of her identity, her home, even her name. Reading it, I felt this weird mix of vindication and discomfort. Vindication because Antoinette finally gets to speak. Discomfort because, well, I’d been complicit in cheering for Jane’s story, ignoring the cost. Rhys doesn’t let you off the hook. She shows how literature itself can be a tool of power—how one person’s classic is another’s erasure.
This isn’t just about old books, either. Think about contemporary stuff, like Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Ifemelu, the Nigerian protagonist, navigates race, love, and identity across continents, and Adichie doesn’t shy away from the messy bits—microaggressions, visa struggles, the way America flattens her into “Black” while Nigeria expects her to fit back into a box she’s outgrown. There’s this scene where Ifemelu blogs about race, and it’s so sharp, so unapologetic, I wanted to stand up and clap. But it’s also exhausting, because she’s constantly negotiating her place in a world that’s quick to define her. That’s cultural power in action—not just who gets to speak, but who gets to be heard.
The Mess of It All
I’m not gonna lie—sometimes I get tired of this. Not the books, but the weight of it. Every story feels like a fight, like you’re wading through layers of history and hurt to get to the heart of it. And maybe that’s the point. Literature doesn’t just reflect cultural power; it forces you to reckon with it. Like, take The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Díaz. Oscar’s this nerdy, overweight Dominican kid in New Jersey, obsessed with sci-fi and love, and he’s up against the legacy of the Trujillo dictatorship, machismo, and the diaspora’s fractured identity. Díaz weaves in footnotes about Dominican history, and at first, I was annoyed—why can’t I just enjoy the story? But then it hit me: there’s no story without the history. The power dynamics—colonial, patriarchal, racial—are the story.
What gets me, though, is how these books don’t just point fingers. They implicate you. Reading Oscar Wao, I laughed at Oscar’s awkwardness, cried at his loneliness, and then felt slapped by the realization that I’m part of the world that chews up kids like him. Same with The God of Small Things—I was so caught up in Rahel and Estha’s world that I almost missed how complicit I am in systems that crush people like Velutha. These stories don’t let you stay neutral. They demand you pick a side, or at least admit you’re standing somewhere.
Why This Matters Now
Look, I know this sounds intense, like I’m reading too much into it. But we’re living in a moment where stories—who tells them, who owns them—are more contested than ever. Think about the books being banned, the authors being “canceled,” the endless debates about “authenticity.” Literature isn’t just art; it’s a power struggle. Who gets to write the immigrant story? The queer story? The story of the colonized? And who decides if it’s “valid”? When I read Things Fall Apart or Wide Sargasso Sea, I’m reminded that these questions aren’t new. They’ve been fought over for centuries, in ink and blood.
What’s different now is the speed. The internet amplifies everything—praise, outrage, erasure. A book can go viral or get buried in a day. And that’s where the cultural power stuff gets tricky. A novel like Americanah can spark a thousand think pieces, but it can also get drowned out by the noise. The negotiation isn’t just in the text; it’s in who reads it, who shares it, who decides it matters.
No Clean Ending
I don’t have a neat takeaway here. Literature’s messy because power is messy. It’s not just about who’s on top; it’s about the stories we tell to justify it, to challenge it, to survive it. Books like Things Fall Apart, Wide Sargasso Sea, The God of Small Things, Americanah, Oscar Wao—they don’t just describe the world; they demand you see it differently. They make you feel the weight of voices silenced, cultures erased, lives dismissed. And yeah, sometimes that weight’s exhausting. But it’s also electric. It’s why I keep reading, keep arguing, keep getting sucked into these worlds.
So, what’s next? Pick up one of these books. Or don’t. But if you do, don’t just read it—fight with it. Let it piss you off, break your heart, make you think. Because that’s what literature does when it’s doing its job: it negotiates, it provokes, it refuses to let you stay comfortable. And in a world where power’s always shifting, that’s the kind of story we need.