Explanatory essays - The Power of Knowle: Essays That Explain the Important Things in Life - Sykalo Eugene 2025

Comparative Study of Religious Dietary Restrictions and Practices
World religions and religious studies

There’s a Hollow in the Grocery Aisle Where the Sacred Used to Sit

It hits you in the cereal aisle sometimes — this creeping absurdity. One shelf over, someone’s comparing sugar content like it’s a moral equation. Meanwhile, I’m squinting at gelatin ingredients, half-dreading that they're pork-derived. Not because I’m Jewish, though my ex was. Not because I’m Muslim, though I used to fast with a roommate for Ramadan, partly out of solidarity, partly out of masochistic curiosity.

No, it’s because I grew up half-believing food could stain your soul.

Or save it.

That eating was never just eating. It was ritual and rebellion, it was control and collapse. Every culture, every faith tradition, has its own strange dance around what you can and can’t put in your mouth — and why. And even when we outgrow the rules, the shape of them lingers. Like phantom limbs. Like guilt with teeth.

So here’s my long, wandering attempt to understand why we hunger the way we do — not just for food, but for meaning. For boundaries. For a God who cares what’s on our plate.

Let’s talk about dietary restrictions in world religions. Not as a neat taxonomy, but as a map of how we try to taste the divine — and sometimes choke on it.

Kosher: Cleanliness Is Next to Godliness (But Also, Don’t Mix Cheese with That)

Let’s start in the Talmud, because that’s where I always feel most lost and, weirdly, most found. Jewish dietary law — kashrut — is ancient, meticulous, and deeply, stubbornly alive. You’d think a rule like “don’t boil a kid in its mother’s milk” (Exodus 23:19) wouldn’t be enough to birth an entire cuisine. And yet.

From that line: no cheeseburgers. No chicken Alfredo. No pizza topped with pepperoni unless it’s the vegan kind that tastes like regret. Utensils can be treyf (non-kosher) by association. Whole kitchens divided like the Red Sea — one side for milk, the other for meat. Separate sponges. Separate souls?

It’s easy to mock — and I have, especially as a lapsed Catholic with inherited trauma and no dietary code beyond "eat your sins in silence." But there’s something heartbreaking and beautiful about a system that says everything matters. That even the way fat crackles in a pan could bring you closer (or farther) from God.

That holiness can live in your mouth.

Halal and the Mercy in Slaughter

Now, Islam. Halal. I remember my roommate Layla explaining it to me, one night when we split a Domino’s pizza and she, delicately, peeled the sausage off like an apology. "It’s not just what you eat," she said. "It’s how it died."

That stuck.

Because halal is not a static checklist; it’s a theology of mercy. An animal must be slaughtered in the name of Allah, swiftly, compassionately, with as little suffering as possible. Blood must be drained — not because it’s gross, but because blood is sacred. It's life. You don’t ingest life casually.

There’s a built-in pause there. A reverence.

And then — here’s the twist — alcohol is completely forbidden. One drop, technically, breaks the rule. No wine, no beer, no cooking with sherry or sipping communion. Which makes me wonder: is there something especially dangerous about intoxication, or is it just too human? Too easy to reach for joy in liquid form, when God is asking for something harder?

Hinduism, Ahimsa, and the Cow That Became a Nation

Let’s pivot east. Slowly. Carefully.

Hindu dietary practices vary wildly by region, caste, and personal devotion, but one rule echoes across most of India: don’t harm. Ahimsa. Non-violence. Especially toward cows, who are not gods but are sacred — living symbols of nourishment, patience, and divine maternity.

I’ve heard Westerners scoff — “It’s just a cow.” But when I spent a month in Varanasi (don’t ask why, it involved heartbreak, climate guilt, and a YouTube video on soul travel), I watched an old man feed roti to a cow with more tenderness than most people give their children. And it clicked.

In a society where reincarnation isn’t a story but a structure, where your past life might have been bovine and your next might be cockroach — what you eat becomes a moral compass. A karmic ledger.

Vegetarianism, then, isn’t just diet. It’s metaphysics on a plate.

But it’s complicated. Dalits (formerly “untouchables”) have often been meat-eaters, not by sacrilege but by survival. So food, again, becomes a marker of class, of purity, of exclusion. And I start to wonder — how much of this is about God, and how much is about us trying to control each other?

Buddhism: Empty Your Bowl

Here’s where things get slippery.

In many Buddhist traditions, especially Theravāda, monks rely on alms. They eat what is given. Desire is suffering; attachment is illusion; food is fuel. End of sermon.

But in Mahāyāna and Zen schools, there’s a stronger vegetarian ethic, rooted again in ahimsa, in avoiding harm. No killing. No eating what was killed. The logic is clean — but the practice? Not always.

I once sat in a monastery in Kyoto, invited by a monk I’d met through a Couchsurfing group (long story), and watched as lunch was served: silent, simple, beautiful. Rice, pickled radish, miso. No garlic or onions — “too stimulating,” the monk said, smiling like he knew how ridiculous that sounded to an American with a jalapeño addiction.

And yet, I got it. The meal felt like prayer. Not just grace before eating, but the whole act was grace. Every bite stripped of performance, of hunger-as-identity. Just presence. Just food.

Which, for someone raised on Catholic guilt and Instagram envy, was almost unthinkably pure.

Christianity: Communion and the Cannibal God

Here’s where I have to laugh, because honestly — Christians are the weirdest eaters of all.

Think about it. Every Sunday, millions gather to sip wine that is (depending on your denomination) either symbolic of or literally the blood of Christ. The bread is His body. You eat your God to become like Him.

Not metaphorically. Not politely.

You eat Him.

And yet, modern Christianity — especially in its American evangelical flavors — has mostly abandoned dietary restrictions. We don’t do kosher. We don’t do halal. We do potlucks and Chick-fil-A. If there’s a theology of food, it’s mostly hidden under casseroles and “pray before you eat” platitudes.

But the Eucharist remains. This strange, ancient ritual of consumption as communion. And it begs the question: what does it mean to take God into your body?

And why are we so quick to forget that’s what we’re doing?

Flashback: My Mother, Making Gumbo During Lent

It was Lent. I was twelve. My mom had forgotten it was Friday and had already started browning sausage in the pan. I watched her hesitate — just a flicker — before sighing and cracking open a can of shrimp. “God understands,” she said.

That moment haunts me.

Because she wasn’t being irreverent. She was tired. She worked two jobs. We weren’t even particularly devout, but Lent was one of the last things she clung to. And still — she made the swap. Because the rule mattered. But mercy mattered more.

Maybe that’s the real secret of religious food laws. They’re supposed to hold us — not strangle us. They’re supposed to guide, not punish. And when they do become punishment, when the rules become more sacred than the people trying to follow them… we lose the point.

Interlude: What Are We Hungry For, Really?

Purity?

Community?

Discipline?

Control?

Grace?

Sometimes I think all religious food laws are just different languages for the same ache: to be clean. To be worthy. To be saved from the chaos of appetite — not just for food, but for sex, power, attention, oblivion.

To say: I belong to something higher than my stomach.

And yet. We are bodies. We are meat wrapped in memory, craving salt and sweetness and touch. And sometimes I wonder if God, in whatever form They take, might prefer we eat joyfully and messily rather than righteously and alone.

In the End, We All Eat With Our Hands

I don’t have a tidy conclusion. No grand theological synthesis.

What I have is this: a memory of eating sticky rice with my fingers in a Laotian temple feast. A vegan Seder where someone cried during the charoset. A halal butcher in Queens who blessed my vegetarian order anyway. My ex-boyfriend whispering the Shehecheyanu over falafel.

What I have is a sense that sacred eating — whether it’s strict or fluid, inherited or chosen — is not about rules. Not really. It’s about remembering we’re not the center of the universe. That something — someone — holds us accountable.

And maybe, on good days, even forgives us.