Literature of antiquity and the Middle Ages - Summary - 2019
The Tragic History of Doctor Faustus
Christopher Marlowe (1564-1593)
The Paradox of Infinite Desire
Can a man possess too much knowledge? This is the central tension of Christopher Marlowe's The Tragic History of Doctor Faustus. The play does not merely tell a story of a deal with the devil; it explores the terrifying space between human limitation and divine infinity. The tragedy lies not in Faustus's failure to achieve power, but in the fact that once he attains it, he finds it utterly hollow. He trades eternity for twenty-four years of magic, only to spend those years performing parlor tricks for emperors and playing pranks on the papacy, transforming a quest for godhood into a series of expensive distractions.
Structural Descent: From Hubris to Triviality
The plot of Doctor Faustus is constructed as a steady, agonizing descent. It begins at the peak of intellectual arrogance and ends in the depths of spiritual terror. The structure is not a linear climb toward a climax, but a spiral downward. The opening scenes establish a high-stakes intellectual crisis: Faustus has mastered all human sciences—philosophy, medicine, law, and theology—and finds them insufficient. This intellectual void drives the primary action, leading to the Faustian Bargain.
The turning point of the play is not the signing of the contract in blood, but the subsequent waste of the power granted. The middle section of the play functions as a series of episodic vignettes that demonstrate the degradation of Faustus's ambition. He moves from wanting to "wall all Germany with brass" to amusing the Emperor Charles V with the ghost of Alexander the Great. The action is driven by a growing sense of boredom and an inability to find satisfaction in the material world, mirroring the spiritual emptiness of the pact itself.
The ending resonates with the beginning through the framing device of the Chorus. The play opens with the Icarus metaphor—wings of wax melting in the sun—and closes with the literal descent of the protagonist into hell. This circularity emphasizes the inevitability of the fall; the ending is written into the beginning, suggesting that the moment Faustus decided to place his own will above divine law, his fate was sealed.
Psychological Portraits: The Architecture of Pride
The Tragedy of Faustus
Faustus is the quintessential Renaissance Man, embodying the era's thirst for discovery and individualism. However, his psychology is defined by a fatal contradiction: he seeks the power of a god but retains the appetites of a man. His motivation is not curiosity for the sake of truth, but a desire for Omnipotence. As the play progresses, we see a man who refuses to repent not because he is convinced of his rightness, but because he is paralyzed by his own pride. His refusal to heed the Good Angel is a psychological defense mechanism; to repent would be to admit that his lifelong intellectual pursuit was a delusion.
Mephistopheles: The Mirror of Despair
Unlike the stereotypical demon, Mephistopheles serves as a psychological mirror and a cautionary voice. He is a tragic figure in his own right, characterized by a profound, existential melancholy. His definition of hell—"where we are is hell"—shifts the concept of damnation from a physical location to a psychological state of permanent separation from the divine. Mephistopheles does not trick Faustus into the pact; he is brutally honest about the horrors of hell. This makes the tragedy more acute: Faustus chooses damnation with his eyes wide open, blinded by the illusion that his individual will is stronger than cosmic law.
The Internal Conflict Externalized
The Good Angel and the Evil Angel are not merely supernatural observers but externalizations of Faustus's fractured psyche. They represent the perpetual struggle between the Conscience and the Ego. The tragedy is that as the play progresses, the Good Angel's voice becomes increasingly distant, not because it is absent, but because Faustus has systematically silenced his capacity for remorse.
Core Ideas and Thematic Conflicts
The play grapples with the tension between Medieval Determinism and Renaissance Humanism. While the Renaissance celebrated the potential of the human mind, the play warns that knowledge without moral grounding is a path to destruction. The Limit of Knowledge is a recurring theme; Faustus discovers that magic can provide information (the movement of planets, the secrets of the earth) but cannot provide meaning or salvation.
Another pivotal theme is the nature of Divine Mercy versus Justice. The appearance of the inscription Homo, fuge (Man, fly) on Faustus's arm is a critical moment of textual evidence showing that the door to salvation remains open until the very end. The play asks whether Faustus is a victim of fate or a perpetrator of his own doom. His final monologue, where he begs for time to stop, reveals the ultimate irony: the man who wanted to command time and space is finally crushed by the ticking of a clock.
| Concept | Initial Aspiration | Eventual Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Power | Subjugating the world/becoming a king | Playing tricks on the Pope and courtiers |
| Knowledge | Unlocking the secrets of the universe | Performing illusions for the Emperor |
| Spirituality | Transcending human limits to reach the divine | Terror and desperation in the face of eternity |
Style and Technique: The Mighty Line and the Grotesque
Marlowe employs Blank Verse (unrhymed iambic pentameter) to create what critics call the "mighty line." The language of Faustus's early soliloquies is expansive and soaring, reflecting his intellectual ambition. However, as he sinks into spiritual decay, the language often shifts toward the prosaic or the repetitive, mirroring his mental decline.
A distinctive technique is the juxtaposition of High Tragedy and Low Comedy. The scenes involving Wagner and the horse-trader serve as a satirical mirror to Faustus's own journey. Just as Faustus sells his soul for power he cannot meaningfully use, the comic characters attempt to use magic for petty thefts and cheap tricks. This creates a distancing effect that emphasizes the absurdity of Faustus's position: the great scholar has become no different from a common conjurer.
The use of the Chorus provides a moral and pedagogical frame. By stepping outside the action to comment on the plot, the Chorus ensures that the audience views the play not as an endorsement of magic, but as a Didactic Warning. The pacing accelerates toward the end, with the final hour of Faustus's life unfolding in a claustrophobic, high-tension sequence that emphasizes the suddenness of judgment.
Pedagogical Value: Questions for the Modern Reader
For a student, Doctor Faustus is an essential study in the ethics of ambition. It prompts a critical examination of the "cost" of progress. In a contemporary context, the play can be read as a meditation on the dangers of scientific or technological advancement stripped of ethical constraints. It asks the reader to consider whether there are some "reserved areas" of knowledge that are inherently dangerous to the human psyche.
When analyzing the text, students should ask themselves: Is Faustus's fall inevitable, or does he possess the agency to change his fate until the final second? Does the play suggest that intellectual curiosity is a sin, or that the sin lies in the Hubris of thinking one is above the laws of nature? By wrestling with these questions, the reader moves beyond the plot of a "deal with the devil" and enters a deeper conversation about the boundaries of human existence.