Top 100 Literature Essay Topics - Ievgen Sykalo 2026
The use of foils in “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare
The Symmetry of Revenge
Aristotelian Foils and the Tragedy of the Renaissance Conscience
Shakespeare utilizes Foils not merely to contrast personalities, but to expose the friction between Medieval Chivalry and Renaissance Humanism. While Hamlet is restricted by Existential Scrupulosity—the need for absolute moral certainty—his counterparts, Laertes and Fortinbras, operate on codes of impulse and statecraft. By placing Hamlet between a man who would "cut a throat i' the church" and a prince who leads an army for a "patch of ground," Shakespeare asks if a modern conscience is a divine gift or a fatal handicap in a corrupt state.
The Triad of Sons: Three Paths to Honor
The core of the play's structure is the comparison of three sons seeking to avenge their fathers. Laertes functions as the foil of Impulse. Upon his return in Act 4, Scene 5, he ignores divine law to seek immediate vengeance, providing a sharp contrast to Hamlet’s refusal to kill the praying Claudius. Conversely, Fortinbras serves as the foil of Public Duty. While Hamlet’s revenge is private and agonizing, Fortinbras’s is political and methodical. Hamlet's admiration for Fortinbras in Act 4, Scene 4 ("How all occasions do inform against me!") reveals his self-loathing; he sees in Fortinbras the ability to act without being paralyzed by the "pale cast of thought."
Fact: Hamlet’s delay is Theological. In the Act 3, Scene 3 "Prayer Scene," he passes up the chance to kill Claudius because he desires Claudius to be "damn'd and black as hell." Per A.C. Bradley, his struggle is the Renaissance Man trying to reconcile an individual conscience with a Medieval Blood-Feud.
The Foil of Madness: Ophelia vs. Hamlet
A frequently overlooked foil is Ophelia. Shakespeare uses her genuine psychological fracture in Act 4 to highlight the artifice of Hamlet's Antic Disposition. While Hamlet uses "madness" as a tactical mask to investigate Claudius, Ophelia’s madness is a visceral reaction to the loss of her father and her autonomy. Her tragic end provides a mirror to Hamlet’s own destruction: both are victims of Social Stratification and the "rotten" state of Denmark, but Hamlet possesses the intellectual agency that Ophelia is denied.
“Rightly to be great / Is not to stir without great argument, / But greatly to find quarrel in a straw / When honor's at the stake.”
Why it sticks: This isn't an "Aha!" moment of victory; it is a moment of Self-Recrimination. Hamlet is shamed by the fact that 20,000 men are marching to their deaths for a "patch of ground," while he, with a murdered father and a stained mother, remains stagnant. It highlights the foil's purpose: to make the protagonist's internal struggle visible to the audience.
Transferable Skill: Identifying the "Mirror vs. Shadow"
The Skill: When analyzing a protagonist, identify the Mirror (someone in the same situation who acts differently) and the Shadow (someone who represents the protagonist’s darker urges). In Hamlet, Laertes is the mirror, and Claudius is the shadow. To apply this elsewhere, ask: "Which character has the same goal as the hero but lacks their moral boundaries?"
The Resolution of Action
In the final scene of Act 5, the "Man of Action" inherits the kingdom. Hamlet’s dying words give his "dying voice" to Fortinbras. This is the ultimate structural irony: the philosopher-prince dies to purge the corruption, but the throne goes to the soldier who never doubted his mission. This transition from Hamlet’s internal drama to Fortinbras’s political order signals the end of the Renaissance individual's struggle against the machinery of history.
- Intro: Define the Foil through the lens of Elizabethan moral philosophy.
- Body 1: The Sons’ Triad—Laertes (Impulse) vs. Fortinbras (Duty) vs. Hamlet (Reason).
- Body 2: The Antic Disposition—Ophelia’s genuine madness as a foil to Hamlet’s performance.
- Body 3: The Prayer Scene (Act 3, Sc. 3)—Delay as a calculated theological decision.
- Conclusion: Fortinbras's Inheritance—Why the man of action wins the state.
Literature educator and essay writing specialist. Over 20 years of experience creating educational content for students and teachers.