Explanatory essays - The Power of Knowle: Essays That Explain the Important Things in Life - Sykalo Eugene 2025

Literature and the Exploration of Cultural Taboos
Comparative literature and cross-cultural analysis

I’m diving headfirst into the murky waters of literature and cultural taboos, with a pen in one hand and a half-spilled coffee in the other, because that’s how I imagine a critic like me would roll—messy, caffeinated, and ready to wrestle with big ideas. The prompt wants a raw, emotionally charged take, so I’m not here to bore you with academic scaffolding or some tidy thesis. Instead, I’m going to let my thoughts sprawl, contradict, and occasionally trip over themselves, like a late-night conversation with a friend who’s read too many novels and has feelings about them. We’re talking about books that poke at the sore spots of culture—taboos, those unspoken lines we cross at our peril—and how they do it in ways that make you squirm, laugh, or maybe even cry. Let’s go.

The Electric Shock of the Forbidden

I’m sitting here thinking about Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov’s fever-dream of a novel, and how it’s basically a Molotov cocktail lobbed at every polite dinner party conversation. It’s not just a book; it’s a dare. Humbert Humbert, with his oily charm and monstrous desires, drags you into a world where love gets twisted into something grotesque, and you’re complicit because you keep reading. That’s the thing about taboos in literature—they don’t just break rules; they make you an accomplice. You’re not supposed to root for a predator, but Nabokov’s prose is so seductive, so lush, you almost forget what you’re reading about. Almost. And then it hits you like a slap: this is wrong, and you’re still here.

Why does that work? Why do we keep turning the pages when every moral fiber in our body is screaming to put it down? It’s not just Nabokov’s wordplay, though, God, those sentences could make a stone blush. It’s because taboos are like live wires—touch them, and you feel the jolt. Literature lets us touch them safely, or at least, safer than real life. Lolita doesn’t just explore pedophilia (a word that feels too clinical for the gut-punch of the book); it forces you to confront the gap between beauty and morality, between what you’re told to feel and what you actually feel. I read it in college, late at night in a dorm room that smelled like burnt popcorn, and I remember thinking, “This shouldn’t be allowed to be this good.” But it is.

Across Cultures, Same Old Shadows

Now, let’s swing to something completely different—say, Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses. If Lolita is a knife slipped under your skin, Rushdie’s book is a fireworks display of blasphemy, identity, and migration, all wrapped in a prose that feels like it’s trying to outrun itself. The taboo here isn’t just religious; it’s the audacity of questioning what’s sacred in a world that’s already fracturing. Rushdie takes the Prophet Muhammad, a figure untouchable in Islam, and spins a dreamlike, irreverent riff on his life. It’s not just provocative—it’s a middle finger to dogma, to cultural purity, to the idea that any story is off-limits.

But here’s where it gets messy, and I love messy. Rushdie isn’t just poking at Islamic taboos; he’s wrestling with what it means to be caught between cultures—Indian, British, believer, skeptic. The book got him a fatwa, sure, but it also got me, a 20-something reader with no skin in the game, to think about how stories shape what we’re allowed to say. I read it on a crowded subway, pages dog-eared, and I kept looking around, half-expecting someone to yell at me for holding it. That’s the power of a taboo—it’s not just in the book; it’s in the air around you.

Compare that to, say, Toni Morrison’s Beloved. Where Rushdie is loud and sprawling, Morrison is quiet, haunting, like a ghost whispering in your ear. The taboo here isn’t blasphemy but the raw, unfiltered pain of slavery’s legacy. Sethe’s choice to kill her child rather than let her be enslaved—it’s not just a plot point; it’s a wound that refuses to heal. Morrison doesn’t let you look away. She makes you sit with the unimaginable, and it’s not about shock value. It’s about truth. I read Beloved in one sitting, on a rainy afternoon, and by the end, I was sobbing, not because it was sad, but because it was true in a way that felt bigger than me.

Why Taboos Hit Different

Here’s a thought that keeps nagging at me: taboos aren’t universal, but the way they make us feel is. Whether it’s Nabokov’s perverse love story, Rushdie’s sacred-profane tightrope walk, or Morrison’s unflinching look at maternal desperation, these books don’t just break rules—they expose how fragile those rules are. Cultures draw lines in the sand, but literature comes along with a stick and scribbles all over them. And yeah, sometimes it’s uncomfortable. Sometimes it’s thrilling. Sometimes it’s both.

Take Yukio Mishima’s Forbidden Colors. I stumbled across it in a used bookstore, its cover faded, and I didn’t know what I was in for. Mishima dives into homosexuality in post-war Japan, a culture that’s all about restraint, honor, and keeping your mess to yourself. The book’s protagonist, Yuichi, is a beautiful young man navigating desire in a world that doesn’t want to acknowledge it exists. It’s not just about being gay—it’s about the betrayal of societal expectations, the taboo of wanting what you’re not supposed to want. Reading it felt like sneaking into someone’s diary, all raw and unfiltered. Mishima doesn’t preach; he just shows you the cost of living a truth nobody wants to hear.

What’s wild is how these books, from different corners of the world, talk to each other. Lolita’s moral ambiguity echoes in Forbidden Colors—both are about desire that’s “wrong” but feels so human. Rushdie’s cultural collisions resonate with Morrison’s exploration of history’s ghosts; both ask what happens when you refuse to stay silent. They’re not just books; they’re conversations across time and place, shouting, whispering, arguing about what it means to be human when the rules tell you to shut up.

The Internet Age and Old Wounds

Okay, let’s get real for a second. We’re in 2025, and the internet has made taboos both louder and weirder. Back in the day, a book like Lolita could hide on a shelf, controversial but safe in its literary bubble. Now? It’d be trending, canceled, and memed to death before anyone read past page 10. The way we talk about taboos has changed—literature doesn’t get to sit in its ivory tower anymore. It’s out here in the group chat, getting dissected by people who’ve never read it but have opinions. And I’m not saying that’s bad, but it’s… different.

Reading The Satanic Verses today feels like scrolling through a comments section where everyone’s yelling about free speech, cultural appropriation, or religious sensitivity. The book hasn’t changed, but the noise around it has. Same with Beloved—it’s not just a novel; it’s a lightning rod for debates about reparations, historical memory, and who gets to tell what stories. Literature used to be a slow burn, something you chewed on over weeks. Now it’s a matchstick, sparking fights before you can even process what you’ve read.

And yet, these books still hit. They hit because taboos aren’t just about breaking rules—they’re about feeling something real. I read Forbidden Colors last year, and it wrecked me, not because it was “edgy” but because Yuichi’s loneliness felt like something I’d seen in myself, in friends, in late-night confessions over cheap wine. That’s what literature does—it takes the stuff we’re afraid to say out loud and makes it sing.

No Neat Bows, Just Loose Ends

I could keep going, dragging in more books—maybe American Psycho for its gleeful violence or The God of Small Things for its quiet rebellion against caste and family—but I won’t. Not because I’m out of steam, but because the point isn’t to catalog every taboo ever written. The point is that literature doesn’t just reflect culture; it cuts into it, exposes the nerves, and dares you to feel the pain. Nabokov, Rushdie, Morrison, Mishima—they’re not here to comfort you. They’re here to make you question, to make you uncomfortable, to make you human.

So, yeah, I’m sitting here with my coffee-stained notebook, thinking about how these books have stuck with me, like burrs caught in my clothes. They don’t resolve neatly. They don’t tell you what to think. They just leave you with the mess—beautiful, ugly, and true. And honestly? That’s enough.