Explanatory essays - The Power of Knowle: Essays That Explain the Important Things in Life - Sykalo Eugene 2025

Colonial and Postcolonial Discourse in Literature: A Journey of Power, Identity, and Cultural Representation
Comparative literature and cross-cultural analysis

Alright, let’s dive into this. I’m tasked with crafting a sprawling, SEO-optimized, emotionally raw article on colonial and postcolonial discourse in literature—comparative lit, cross-cultural vibes, all that jazz. The goal? To make it feel like a feverish late-night rant from a critic who’s equal parts obsessed, sarcastic, and a little unhinged, but still sharp as hell. Think Brandon Taylor’s wit crossed with Lauren Oyler’s scalpel-like takedowns, served with a side of internet-age messiness. No sterile academic paper here. This is for readers who’d rather scroll X for hot takes than slog through JSTOR, who want their lit crit to hit like a podcast monologue—messy, vivid, alive.

The Weight of Words in a World That Won’t Shut Up

Colonial and postcolonial literature isn’t just books on a shelf; it’s a screaming match across centuries. These texts—whether it’s Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe or Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians—are battlegrounds where power, identity, and culture slug it out. I’m sitting here, flipping through pages, and it’s like every line’s daring me to pick a side. Who gets to speak? Who gets erased? And why does it still feel so damn urgent in 2025, when we’re all drowning in hot takes about “decolonizing” everything from syllabi to skincare routines?

Let’s start with the colonizers’ stories, because they’re the ones who kicked this whole mess off. Take Robinson Crusoe. Man lands on an island, declares himself king, and turns Friday into his personal errand boy. It’s not just a survival tale; it’s a blueprint for empire. Defoe’s writing is so smug, so sure of its own righteousness, it makes me want to hurl the book across the room. But here’s the thing: it’s also gripping. You’re stuck in Crusoe’s head, rooting for him to outsmart the wilderness, even as you’re cringing at how he treats anyone who isn’t, well, him. That contradiction? That’s the hook. It’s why these old books still claw at us. They’re not just stories—they’re propaganda that somehow forgot to stop being human.

Now, fast-forward to the postcolonial response, where writers like Chinua Achebe and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o grab the mic and say, “Nah, we’re not your sidekicks.” Achebe’s Things Fall Apart isn’t just a novel; it’s a middle finger to every European who thought Africa was a blank slate. Okonkwo’s world—gritty, flawed, alive—doesn’t exist to make white readers feel cozy. It’s a universe unto itself, and when it crumbles under colonial weight, you feel it in your gut. I read it in college, half-asleep in a lecture hall, and still felt like someone had punched me. Achebe doesn’t care if you’re “ready” for his story. He’s telling it anyway.

Power’s Sneaky Little Tricks

Here’s where it gets messy. Colonial lit loves to dress up power as adventure or destiny—think Kipling’s “white man’s burden” nonsense. It’s all heroic quests and noble sacrifices, until you squint and see the bloodshed underneath. Postcolonial writers, though? They’re not here to play nice. They expose the cracks. Like, take Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children. It’s chaotic, sprawling, a fever dream of India’s birth, and it’s funny—until it’s not. Rushdie’s narrator, Saleem, is falling apart, literally and figuratively, and you’re laughing one minute, gutted the next. It’s not just a story about independence; it’s about how power—colonial or otherwise—twists identity into knots.

I’m obsessed with how these books talk to each other across time. It’s like a Twitter feud, but with better prose. Defoe’s Crusoe says, “I’m the hero!” and Achebe’s like, “Hero? You’re a thief.” Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians takes it further, turning the colonizer’s gaze inward. The Magistrate, this sad-sack bureaucrat, starts questioning his own empire’s brutality, but he’s too weak to do anything about it. Reading it feels like watching someone drown in their own guilt—slow, suffocating, and weirdly beautiful. I mean, who writes like that? Who makes you pity a cog in the machine while still hating the machine?

Identity as a Battlefield

Let’s talk identity, because that’s where this all hits home. Colonial texts love to flatten people into stereotypes—savage, servant, saint. Postcolonial writers, though, they’re like, “Oh, you thought we were simple?” Take Jean Rhys’s Wide Sargasso Sea. It’s a prequel to Jane Eyre, but really, it’s a Molotov cocktail lobbed at Brontë’s attic. Rhys gives us Antoinette, the “madwoman” Rochester locks away, and suddenly she’s not a plot device—she’s a person, torn apart by race, gender, and empire. I read it last summer, sprawled on my couch, and I kept muttering, “This is unfair.” Antoinette’s voice is so raw, so desperate, it’s like she’s clawing her way out of Brontë’s book.

Then there’s Tsitsi Dangarembga’s Nervous Conditions. Tambu, the narrator, is this Zimbabwean girl fighting for an education in a world that says she doesn’t deserve one. Her hunger—for knowledge, for freedom—is so vivid it’s almost painful. I kept thinking, “God, I know that feeling.” Not the exact same struggle, obviously, but that itch to prove you’re more than what the world expects. Dangarembga doesn’t just write about colonialism; she shows how it seeps into your bones, your family, your dreams.

Why This Still Matters (No, Really)

Okay, but why are we still reading this stuff? Why not just binge some new Netflix show about identity and call it a day? Because these books don’t just reflect the past—they’re mirrors for now. Scroll through X, and you’ll see the same fights: who gets to tell whose story? Who gets to be “civilized”? Colonialism’s ghost is everywhere—trade deals, borders, even the way we talk about “global culture.” Postcolonial lit reminds us that power isn’t just tanks and flags; it’s stories. It’s who gets to write the ending.

I’m thinking about Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. It’s not explicitly about empire, but it’s soaked in its aftermath—caste, class, the way history crushes the small and powerless. Roy’s prose is so lush it’s almost too much, like biting into overripe fruit. But it’s the twins, Estha and Rahel, who break me. Their tiny, shattered lives are what empire leaves behind. Reading it feels like eavesdropping on a tragedy you can’t stop.

The Mess of Representation

Representation’s the buzzword now, right? Everyone’s yelling about it online, from booktok to academic conferences. But postcolonial lit was doing the work before it was a hashtag. Writers like Buchi Emecheta and Derek Walcott didn’t just “represent” their cultures—they redefined what representation could mean. Emecheta’s Second-Class Citizen is brutal, following a Nigerian woman in London who’s fighting racism, sexism, and her own husband. It’s not uplifting. It’s not “inspirational.” It’s real. I read it and felt like I’d been slapped awake.

Walcott’s poetry, though—god, it’s something else. His Omeros takes the epic tradition, the West’s favorite flex, and makes it Caribbean. It’s Homer, but it’s also fishermen, healers, the sea. Walcott doesn’t just borrow from the canon; he steals it, remixes it, makes it his. Reading him is like watching someone build a cathedral out of driftwood.

No Neat Bows, Just Questions

I could keep going, but I’m already spiraling. Colonial and postcolonial lit isn’t a tidy debate—it’s a brawl, a love letter, a scream. These books don’t solve anything, and neither do I. They just make you think, which, in a world obsessed with quick fixes and viral clips, feels radical. So, yeah, pick up Achebe or Rushdie or Rhys. Let them mess with you. Let them make you mad or sad or just… awake.

What’s next? Maybe I’ll reread Midnight’s Children and yell at Saleem for being such a drama queen. Or maybe I’ll just sit here, book in hand, wondering why these stories hit so hard than any tweet ever could. You tell me—what’s a book that’s wrecked you lately?